In
the pass week’s lab the group was introduced and experimented with to
Knex. The whole lab was dedicated for
the groups to get familiarized with Knex and have an idea of their building
versatility and their constraints. For
the first part of the lab each member was able to experiment and play with
them. After each member understood how
they worked, the group discussed how they would be using them to build the
bridge. The group made several
accomplishments during the experimentation with Knex like been able to use the
right building pieces to bring the cost down, while keeping the strength of the
structure.
The transition from designing a bridge
by using WPBD, to building a “real bridge” was quite significant. While WPBD had its own constraints, it was a
really versatile program regarding the design of the bridge. It didn’t have any major constraint that
would prevent us from building a bridge in any way. There were no length of the trust nor angle
constraints. The program was really
efficient in telling what would be a design that would work from one that would
collapse. Its use was significant and of great importance for coming up with a
prosperous design. After playing with
Knex several limitations were found. The
main limitation was that the gussets would only allow pieces to be put on two
angles, 90 and 45 degrees. For the
group’s bridge this would be a limitation because the second level side cords
needed to be on a certain angle to be able to get a greater strength. Another limitation is the fact that Knex only
considered of building cords of specific sizes. Also the cords will have one specific diameter
and we would not be able to play between bars and tubes as in WPBD to bring the
costs down. Knex is the fact that they would not allow the group to build the
bridge the same way it was designed originally.
No comments:
Post a Comment