A1-Almendariz
In the
second class we were assigned that each member of the group should design their
own bridge. The main objective of the
assignment was to design a “safe” bridge that would have the best strength to
cost ratio. The bridge had some standard
constraints and rules that they must obey: All bridges should be running
through a “24” meter canyon. Bridges
should have a clear span meaning that they should not have any intermediate
support. Also they should not use any
cable anchorages and use standard abutments.
They should be set to have a medium strength concrete (0.23 meters thick)
two-lane roadway. Finally through
evaluation they should be able to support a standard load truck of 225kN.
My bridge
went through a series a changes to be able to reach what I think is a
successful design. Each change was made
basically after testing the bridge watching for weak points and improving them. I decided to initialize my design by using through
Truss-Warren template. I decided to use
this template because I saw it as the strongest of all templates because I
think that triangles are really successful in distributing the weight. I decided to run the test by just using the
template too see what were the main weak points that needed to be
improved. For this template the main
weak points that I found was in the whole upper surface of the bridge. The bridge would collapse completely, and the
truck would not be able to even get on the bridge. It is for this reason that I decided to add a
similar second floor using the same idea of triangles as the original
template. After rerunning the test,
there was a lot of improvement in the resistance of the bridge. In difference from the first time, now truck
would be able to run until the half of the bridge. There was only three week points found that
needed improvement. There were two in
each side of the second floor and one in the middle. To be able to solve these weaknesses I
decided to divide each section into two.
This would first shorten the size of each member and form two
triangles. With the changes made, the
bridge was once more tested and its results were good. The design did now have any single weak
point, it was able to support the whole weight of the truck all the way
through, and it didn’t bend significantly.
The final cost of the bridge design was $426, 912.12. I think that with more time, the bridge
design could be worked and improved to reduce its cost while keeping its
strength. From this design I was able to
learn that triangle structures are really efficient in bridges and long members
will have a lower strength. The first image is from the final design in 2D from the "Drawing board view". The second image when the bridge was been tested and the truck was right in the middle of it. The last three images are from the "load test results".
No comments:
Post a Comment